The cost of protectionism will be paid by the world’s poorest

This post was originally published on The Economic Times

The World Bank‘s measure of extreme poverty, at $2.15 a day, represents a level of deprivation that is rarely seen in the West. At this income, hunger or its shadow is an inescapable feature of life. Estimates suggest that over half the children born to poor families are undernourished. One could argue that even a small material improvement for a family living in such dire circumstances adds more to the sum of human welfare than big gains for the more fortunate.

One of humanity’s greatest achievements over the past half century has been its striking progress in reducing poverty. The share of the global population living under the poverty line fell to under 10 percent in 2021 from well over 40 percent in 1981, with much of the reduction coming from just two countries: China and India. The decline was so unexpectedly rapid that a United Nations goal of halving global poverty was achieved five years early. The improvement has also led to a more equitable distribution of global income, with developing countries accounting for a sharply rising share of world G.D.P.

International trade was indispensable

Read the rest of this post, which was originally published on The Economic Times.

Previous Post

Container carrier profits soar on record volumes, higher rates

Next Post

How Cactus is helping non-English researchers finish their papers with an AI touch